20061025

Movies to see

I haven't been seeing many movies lately, but fortunately the only two I've seen in recent memory have been standouts. One of them, Shortbus, I was skeptical of because its selling point seemed to me to be that there was actual, explicit sex going on in the movie! Even though I'd enjoyed John Cameron Mitchell's other movie,"Hedwig and the Angry Inch," I was wondering what the point of this porn with a pedigree would be. Even after Matt Savage wrote approvingly of the movie in his column I didn't think much of it. But then I read a few snippets of reviews of the movie, and I suddenly it sounded like the type of movie I'd dig. And what do you know, I thought it was pretty fantastic. The sex wasn't superfluous, it actually fit nicely into the plot, and augmented to story, even. Overall, it's a very touching movie, about freaks and the sexual and non-sexual relationships they have with all sorts of people. And within this, these people just trying to find a place in the world that they're comfortable with. I give it my seal of approval.

I also saw Little Children last week, and it's one of those movies that's really very good, but difficult to recommend because it's disturbing in a lot of ways. If, like me, you're into movies that focus on the dark underbelly of the suburbs - the promises, fantasies, and ultimately the dashed hopes of living in the land of manicured lawns and 2.5 kids - then this movie is for you. It's another movie who's focus is freaks - though freaks of another kind, freaks who've subjected themselves to the suburban life but who've found it difficult living in a place that has pretty much drained the livelihood and passion of their everyday lives. Throw in a convicted sex offender who's relocated to this Boston suburb of Wyndam (!?!?!?), and this ensemble cast pulls off a winner. Totally worth seeing, though disturbing.

2 Comments:

Blogger morphogen said...

But didn't you think the ending of "Shortbus" was just *too* peachy? Disneyesque even? For all the graphic sex this movie had, it was unnecessary, especially with that musical lollipop ending. Does John Cameron Mitchell really think that unhibited free love, as fun as it might be, has no bad consequences, and is the true key to happiness? The middle of the movie was telling me, no. But that ending? Not so sure.

10:14 PM  
Blogger Chris said...

On the contrary, I really liked the ending. Everyone did end up pretty happy, but they also had to go through a lot of frustration, tears, and trials to get there. I don't think the moral of the story is that uninhibited free love is the key to happiness. Sure, the characters in this story go through a lot of sexual relationship experimentation. But the story is universal! It's good to be happy, and for some people it's difficult to get there, but eventually it is possible to get there! I don't even care that the story didn't have a horrible ending for anyone, which may have been more realistic. I think the point of the movie was to have sort of a storybook approach, and to be uplifting and inspiring.

As to the whole bad consequences thing - well, yes, you have to suspend disbelief. Or believe that everyone at Shortbus has no STDs, and if they did (and knew about it) would take the proper precautions. But again, that's the whole storybook aspect of it. Obviously not in the real world, but in this world (it does seem otherworldly with the cartoonish city that the movie descends into and ascends from) I think that's the case.

10:49 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home